Competitor radar
The companies you watch and what they do: grants, trials, conferences and papers as we find them. And the labs that publish with their products.
The platform
Lacuna reads methods and discussion sections, grants, trials, patents and catalogues from your company’s point of view, and turns them into opportunities you can explain: who, what problem, why your solution, and why reach out.
Four questions
A name is not an opportunity. An opportunity says who, what problem they documented, why your product could address it and why they would want to hear from you, with the evidence attached.
50,815 researchers with deep profiles in 148 countries · 30,404 verified quotes from 14,860 researchers · a contact email for 14,135 of them
Which researcher or research group have we identified?
What concrete challenge has the researcher documented, and where is the evidence?
Why do we judge that your product or technology can address the problem?
What is the concrete, scientifically relevant reason to start a conversation?
What we collect
The same reading that finds a researcher’s problem also maps the market around it: your competitors, your own brand, the products and consumables in use, and where the field is going. All of it is in the platform, for everyone on every plan.
The companies you watch and what they do: grants, trials, conferences and papers as we find them. And the labs that publish with their products.
Papers and preprints that cite your product or its method. Independent labs, outside your own team, are the real signal.
The companies in the market, with the corporate group they belong to. Open one for its products, people and activity.
The product catalogue: who makes each product, and which researchers name it in their methods.
Kits, reagents and consumables, down to the catalogue number when the paper gives one, next to the makers' own catalogue lines.
Antibody targets in the literature, and the antibodies labs name in their methods, with supplier and catalogue number where they give them.
The readers, cytometers, sequencers and platforms researchers report using: the installed base you sell against, or build on.
Patents in the life-science classes (A61, C12, G01N, C07K, C07H, B01L), with applicant and date.
Publication momentum by MeSH topic in the global literature: which methods and fields are growing, and which are fading.
Life-science conferences and symposia, where your field meets. Exhibitors and speakers matched to profiles, and your own attendee lists too.
Dated events on the researchers and companies you watch: new funding, trial registrations and public procurement.
Which distributors carry which brands, and the contract research organisations active in your field.
Figures counted from the database on 2026-10-10, not rounded up for the website.
How it works
Titles and abstracts say what a study found. The methods and discussion sections say what it was done with, and what went wrong. That is where the instrument, the antibody and the catalogue number live, and where a researcher writes that the CV was too high or the assay would not scale.
Each problem is checked against the sentence it came from and dropped when it does not hold up; each product mention has to be grounded in the text before it is kept. That is why our verified count is smaller than our extracted count, and why we publish both.
Everyone gets the whole dataset. What changes is the lens: tell us your products and your competitors, and the matching, ranking, alerts and briefings reorder around your case.
Every opportunity arrives with the quote it is based on, the paper behind it, and why we think your product fits. The first line of your message is about their work.
Bring one product. In a screen-share we show you researchers who have described the problem it solves, and the market around them. Prices are public: monthly or yearly, cancel any time.